Gordon v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Petitioners seek review of the Land Use Board of Appeals’ affirmance of Clackamas County’s land use decisions allowing the Port of Portland to expand and increase the basing capacity of an airport in the Mulino area. We affirm.
Three of petitioners’ four assignments challenge LUBA’s conclusion that the county’s exceptions to Goals 3 and 4 are consistent with ORS 197.732(1)(c) and with the applicable exceptions rule, OAR 660-04-022(1). Although petitioners make a heroic effort to cast their arguments as points of law, we conclude that the first three assignments fail, because — as relevant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Green v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- West Hills & Island Neighbors, Inc. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Fisher v. City of GreshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- McCoy v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Mason v. Mountain River Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Schatz v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Sokol v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.