Legal Opinion

Polk County v. Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1981No. 26351, CA 17301, SC 27662PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*71PETERSON, J.

This is an injunction case in which the plaintiff county asserts that the defendant’s rock quarry is an unlawful land use under the county zoning ordinance: The defendant contends that his use is a permitted “nonconforming use,”1 ORS 215.130(5). We allowed review to consider the relationship between a permitted nonconforming use and “the rationale of vested rights” discussed in the opinion below, 50 Or App 361, 366, 622 P2d 1152 (1981), and in our opinion in Clackamas Co. v. Holmes, 265 Or 193, 508 P2d 190 (1973).

I

STATEMENT OF FACTS

We draw upon the Court of Appeals opinion for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bither v. Baker Rock Crushing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Borough of Saddle River v. BobinskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Eklund v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Alderson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Mason v. Mountain River Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API