Legal Opinion

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1986No. 84-CONT-383; CA A34869PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC’s continuance order in its compliance review of Linn County’s comprehensive plan and land use regulations. ORS 197.251. In its first assignment, petitioner argues that LCDC erred by approving the county’s “developed and committed” exceptions to Goals 3 or 4 for 20 areas, most of which are vacant and are contained within surrounding exception areas. Petitioner contends that the information the county submitted to LCDC in support of the challenged exceptions does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 197.732, Goal 2 and OAR 660-04-025 to 660-04-028, because it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Forman v. Clatsop CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Mason v. Mountain River Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Hammack & Associates, Inc. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Coos Co.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API