Legal Opinion

Clackamas County v. Holmes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1973PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff, Clackamas County, filed this suit to enjoin defendants from completing construction of a chicken processing plant on the grounds that the construction violated county zoning and building code ordinances. The trial court enjoined the defendants from any further construction, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, 11 Or App 1, 501 P2d 333 (1972). We granted review.

The defendants raise two issues on this appeal:(1) the validity of the county zoning ordinance, and(2) whether the defendants acquired a prior nonconforming use and vested right to complete construction of the processing plant.

I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors of Scott County v. PaaskeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  2. Town of Hempstead v. LynneNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Clackamas County v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Washington County v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bowers v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API