Legal Opinion

Stadnicky v. Southpark Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1997No. S-7359PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Southpark Terrace Homeowner’s Association sought to enforce a restrictive covenant against the Stadnickys. The covenant barred the use of metal roofing in Southpark subdivision. The superior court granted summary judgment and awarded actual, reasonable attorney’s fees to Southpark. The Stadnickys appeal. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The Stadnicky family bought a home in the Southpark Subdivision in Anchorage in 1984. The property was subject to a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions adopted by the Southpark Terrace Homeowner’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ford v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Newton v. MagillAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Miller v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jaymot v. Skillings-DonatAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. DeNardo v. GCI Communication Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Clemensen v. Providence Alaska Medical CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ball v. Birch, Horton, Bittner and CherotAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API