Zeman v. Lufthansa German Airlines
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Adolf Zeman, d/b/a A.Z. Construction, appeals from a grant of a summary judgment by the Superior Court in favor of Lufthansa German Airlines. Zeman sought to recover compensatory and punitive damages from Lufthansa based on breach of lease contract, promissory estop-pel and fraud theories. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
Zeman built three 24-unit apartment buildings in 1976 on Eureka Street in Anchorage. Zeman entered into a lease agreement with Air France for 32 units, to commence November 1, 1977, and to last for a term of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.