Legal Opinion

Zeman v. Lufthansa German Airlines

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1985No. S-221PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Adolf Zeman, d/b/a A.Z. Construction, appeals from a grant of a summary judgment by the Superior Court in favor of Lufthansa German Airlines. Zeman sought to recover compensatory and punitive damages from Lufthansa based on breach of lease contract, promissory estop-pel and fraud theories. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

Zeman built three 24-unit apartment buildings in 1976 on Eureka Street in Anchorage. Zeman entered into a lease agreement with Air France for 32 units, to commence November 1, 1977, and to last for a term of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API