Legal Opinion

Ford v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1991No. S-3754PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case involves a single issue: does Alaska Civil Rule 16.1(g) provide the exclusive procedure for dismissing “fast-track” 1 cases for failure to prosecute, or may a trial court dismiss a fast-track case under Civil Rule 41(e). Rule 16.1(g) provides that the court will transfer a fast-track ease to the inactive calendar if a motion to set trial is not filed within 270 days after service of the summons and complaint. If the plaintiff still does not move to set trial and fails to convince the court that good cause exists to continue the case on the inactive calendar,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Evron v. GiloAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Newton v. MagillAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brooks v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Breck v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API