Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Xerox Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1986No. S-732, 741PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

James and Murilda Hayes (the Hayeses) appeal a verdict in which the jury awarded Mr. Hayes $50,000 and Mrs. Hayes $10,000 for injuries sustained from an automobile collision with Charles Green (Green), an employee of Xerox Corporation (Xerox). The Hayeses’ appeal raises the following issues: 1) did the superior court err in denying Mr. Hayes’ motion for a new trial; 2) did the superior court err in excluding evidence on the issue of punitive damages; 3) did the superior court err in its award to Xerox of costs and attorney’s fees; and 4) did the superior court err in…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Baker v. MarcusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API