Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1995No. S-5682PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice, pro tem.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises from divorce proceedings between Harris (Sonny) and Joyce Miller and presents a question of first impression for this court: whether a divorced parent who is required to pay support to a child under Alaska Civil Rule 90.3 is entitled to child support credit for social security payments the child receives on the parent’s behalf. We hold that the parent is entitled to receive such credit.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Joyce and Sonny Miller married in Anchorage, on November 22, 1981. Approximately two and a half years later, Joyce gave…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. MeridaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Jenkins v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Greenway v. HeathcottAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Stultz v. StultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Stadnicky v. Southpark Terrace Homeowner's Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API