Legal Opinion

DeNardo v. GCI Communication Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1999No. S-8705PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In a suit against his telephone company, a customer claimed that its failure to reactivate his account prevented him from entering its eall-to-enter sweepstakes and deprived him of prizes having a total value of $1,020,000. The superior court granted summary judgment and attorney’s fees to the company, reasoning that the company’s tariff barred the customer’s claim and that the claimed damages were too speculative. We affirm. Given the great improbability that the customer would have won any prize, we conclude that the customer’s claim that the company…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rutledge v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Kooly v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Robles v. Shoreside Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. DeNardo v. ABC Inc. RVs MotorhomesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Turner v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API