Legal Opinion

Newton v. Magill

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1994No. S-5219PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

This is a slip and fall case brought by a tenant against her landlord. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the landlord based on the traditional common law rule that a landlord is generally not liable for dangerous conditions in leased premises. We hold that this rule no longer applies in view of the legislature’s enactment of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, and therefore reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In the summer of 1988, Darline Newton moved from Idaho to Petersburg to join her husband, Stan, who had moved to Alaska a few…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sargent v. RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Mariorenzi v. Joseph DiPonte, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
  5. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. LITTLE BY LITTLE v. BellMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Merrill v. JansmaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. Planned Parenthood of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Savage Arms, Inc. v. Western Auto Supply Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API