Flannigan v. Towle
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
At the time of the submission of this cause, in accordance with rule 14 ’ of the supreme and appellate courts, there was a suggestion by appellants of diminution of the record. According to the certificate of the clerk below the printed record contains an incomplete transcript of the bill of exceptions as actually settled by the trial judge. The defect consists in the omission of the objections made by appellants to the introduction in evidence of the deeds upon which defendant Towle relies for his title and the exceptions taken to the orders of the court overruling said objections.
As the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayes v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Esterbrook v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ellis v. WitmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Steele v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Linch v. PerrineIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Hotchkiss v. HansbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Ritzman v. RitzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wechsler v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.