Legal Opinion

Esterbrook v. O'Brien

California Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1893No. 15256PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This action was brought to enjoin the defendant O’Brien, as tax collector, from selling a certain lot, belonging to the plaintiff, for taxes levied to pay the principal and interest of the “Dupont Street bonds,” under the act of the legislature providing for the widening of Dupont Street, approved March 23, 1876. (Stats. 1875-76, p. 433.)

The complaint shows that the property is situated in the district assessed for the improvement; that the preliminary proceedings prescribed by said act were duly taken; that a report of the commissioners was made to and confirmed by the county court showing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Weber v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Merchants Trust Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API