Legal Opinion

Linch v. Perrine

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1931No. 5731PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

—Action to foreclose farm laborers’ liens. The complaint alleges that appellants were employed by I. B. Perrine and wife to perform labor upon, and render assistance in caring for, a crop of apples growing upon the southwest quarter of Section 28, Twp. 9 S., R. 17 E., B. M., and the north half of Section 23, Twp. 9 S., R. 17' E., B. M., during the season of 1930.

Respondent Intermountain Produce Company is alleged to have purchased the entire apple crop of the Perrines, and respondents Reilly Atkinson & Company, Inc., and Boise-Payette Lumber Company are alleged to have attached moneys in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lindley v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Lus v. PecararoIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Shultz v. ShivelyOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Nohrnberg v. BoleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Evans v. Power CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williard v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ross v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Boone v. P & B LOGGING COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Kerby v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sullens & Hoss, Inc. v. FarvourDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API