Ritzman v. Ritzman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Defendant appeals from an interlocutory decree in partition, which adjudges that the plaintiff and defendant are tenants in common of the real property involved, and that the plaintiff is the owner of an undivided fifty-five one-hundredths thereof and the defendant the owner of an undivided forty-five one-hundredths thereof. The grounds alleged by defendant in support of his appeal have been variously stated, but, when analyzed, they all resolve themselves into the single contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding of the trial court to the effect that the plaintiff is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Estate of Piper v. PeopleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Flannigan v. TowleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Hinton v. Winsor & Uinta Coal & Mining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1880
- Miller v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gunn v. GunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Stewart v. AbernathyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Withington v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Wechsler v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976