Hotchkiss v. Hansberger
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. Geo. E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The object of this action is to secure a decree quieting plaintiff’s title to certain property which is described in the complaint.
The court awarded to plaintiff judgment as prayed for, and it is on an appeal from said judgment, and also from the order refusing defendants a new trial that the cause is brought to this court.
The property involved in this controversy consists of a large number of town lots situated in the town of Selma and in additions thereto, in Fresno county.
Defendants claim title to said lots through a sale thereof and a deed executed thereupon by the tax collector of Fresno…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- County of Los Angeles v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- San Jose Gas Co. v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dougery v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hinz v. Musselshell CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Young v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Knoke v. SwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.