Ellis v. Witmer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for new trial.
The plaintiffs are the owners of a tract of land in the city of Los Angeles, described in the complaint, on which a street-assessment had been levied, and a bond issued to one Donegan, to secure the same, under the provisions of the Street-improvement Act of March 18, 1885, as amended March 17, 1891 (Stats. 1891, p. 116), and the bond having become delinquent, the property was sold by the city treasurer, and the certificate of purchase assigned to the defendant Witmer. The suit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Simmons v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Quint v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Fox v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Stege v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.