Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. HUNTINGTON, ETC. v. Sulmonetti

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1976No. A7602-02684, SC 24523PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding. Plaintiff-relator (employer) seeks our writ commanding a circuit court judge to vacate his order remanding a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits back to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The claim had been denied by the Board on the ground that it was barred by prior litigation under the doctrine of res judicata. The circuit court judge disagreed and remanded the claim to the Board for a determination of whether claimant was in the course and scope of his employment when he sustained his accidental injury.

Claimant was injured in April 1969. He filed his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bebout v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Mackenzie v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bebout v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mission Theatres, Inc. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
  5. Dahlstrom v. Huntington Rubber MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. MurchisonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Holden v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Fox v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API