Mission Theatres, Inc. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
After the expiration of the “Consent Decree” entered in United States v. Paramount Pictures et al., the District Court, Southern District of New York, held “everything relating to rights under and remedies for violation of the Sherman Act (was) open for consideration” of the Court in that case. 66 F.Supp. 323, 333. The Court specifically stated, “we do not deem ourselves bound by any provision of the consent decree, if we now find that it violates the Sherman Act.” 66 F.Supp. at page 342. As revealed by the findings of fact and final decrees subsequently entered in that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- De Sollar v. HanscomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wagner v. BaronSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- STATE EX REL. HUNTINGTON, ETC. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- St. Louis County v. Village of Peerless ParkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Bravo v. Treasurer of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- City of Sioux City v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.