Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. Murchison

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1980No. SC 26477, SC 26478PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*267TANZER, J.

This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relators are indicted criminal defendants who petition this court to mandate the circuit judge and district attorney to conduct a preliminary hearing or dismiss the charges. Relators claim entitlement to a preliminary hearing, notwithstanding their indictment. The defendants on the writ assert, among other things, that mandamus is not a proper remedy because the relators may appeal if convicted.

The power of this court to issue writs of mandamus is granted by the constitution, Or Const, Art VII (Am), § 2,1 and defined by statute, ORS 34.110,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. GarzaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. HaasOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Englert v. MacDonellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. State v. CarusoOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Anderson v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API