State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. Murchison
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*267TANZER, J.
This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relators are indicted criminal defendants who petition this court to mandate the circuit judge and district attorney to conduct a preliminary hearing or dismiss the charges. Relators claim entitlement to a preliminary hearing, notwithstanding their indictment. The defendants on the writ assert, among other things, that mandamus is not a proper remedy because the relators may appeal if convicted.
The power of this court to issue writs of mandamus is granted by the constitution, Or Const, Art VII (Am), § 2,1 and defined by statute, ORS 34.110,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. McLeanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. GarzaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. HaasOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Englert v. MacDonellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- State v. CarusoOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.