Legal Opinion

Dahlstrom v. Huntington Rubber Mills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is a workmen's compensation case in which the claim was denied successively by the hearing officer, the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the circuit court, each time because it was found that the claim was untimely filed. The question on this appeal is whether the claimant should be allowed to produce additional evidence before the hearing officer concerning the reason he gave, after the hearing, for not filing the claim in the year’s time allowed by statute. That reason was his allegation of mental incapacity. ORS 656.265 (4) (c) and 656.319 (1) (a), (d). ①

The claim arose from an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Mansfield v. CAPLENER BROTHERSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. HUNTINGTON, ETC. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Buster v. Chase Bag Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Maumary v. Mayfair MarketsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. McFadden v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API