Legal Opinion

Fox v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 2007No. 031011107; A127375PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a limited judgment dismissing for a second time her product liability claims against defendants Genzyme Corporation and Valleylab, Inc. Plaintiff, whose claims against those defendants had previously been dismissed as time barred, refiled her claims under a special “revival” statute enacted by the legislature in 2003. The trial court concluded that that statute was unconstitutional and dismissed plaintiffs claims against defendants with prejudice. We reverse and remand.

Before relating the facts of this case, a brief discussion of the evolution of the statute of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Fleming v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Clemente v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State Ex Rel. Dewberry v. KulongoskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API