Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
A demurrer to an amended complaint was sustained, and on plaintiff’s declining to amend judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The amended complaint was filed on March 23, 1904. It alleged that plaintiff was the owner of a parcel of land in the town of Lompoc, extending along and to the center line of Laurel Avenue, a public highway; that on January 1, 1900, while plaintiff’s predecessor in interest was the owner of the property, the defendant, a railroad corporation, without the consent of the owner, and without any condemnation proceedings,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bristol v. Washington CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.