Legal Opinion
Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 2002No. B146142PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.
In this inverse condenmation action, plaintiff Veisna Kong, doing business as Bartha’s Donuts, appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer filed by defendants City of Hawaiian Gardens Redevelopment Agency and City of Hawaiian Gardens 1 without leave to amend and dismissing plaintiffs first amended complaint.
Plaintiff contends he alleged facts establishing causes of action for inverse condemnation and for precondemnation damages. Although the trial court correctly sustained defendants’ demurrer, we conclude that leave to amend must be granted. We therefore reverse the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Qualcomm, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gu v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- DOE II v. MySpace Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.