Legal Opinion

City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1941No. L. A. 16759PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is an action for injunction and damages based on the defendant’s alleged past and threatened future invasion of certain easements owned by the plaintiff. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury, and from a judgment entered for the defendant the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The parties are competing vendors of water service in an unincorporated area situated between the cities of Arcadia and Pasadena. The defendant, under claim of right and with the admitted permission of the servient owners, installed water mains and service connections in certain five-foot easements…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bakeman v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Murphy Chair Co. v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Herzog v. GrossoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API