Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
We granted a hearing in this case to consider whether one who acquires a valid prescriptive easement over another’s property nonetheless may be required to compensate that person for either (1) the fair market value of the easement, or (2) the cost of removing or relocating any encroaching structures which interfere with use of the easement. We conclude that the statutes which define and validate prescriptive easements neither authorize nor contemplate an award to the underlying property owner of compensation for the reasonable value of the easement, and that under *569the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Taormino v. DennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Community Feed Store, Inc. v. Northeastern Culvert Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Windsor Pacific LLC v. Samwood Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.