Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2013No. 0904014, 0902172, 0902171, 0902170; A150552PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, SAIF Corporation (SAIF) and employer Quantum Resource Recovery (Quantum) seek judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), which determined that the worsening of claimant’s preexisting L4-5 disc herniation was a “consequential condition” under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A) because a compensable injury to claimant’s left foot was “the major contributing cause” of that condition.1 See ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A) (“No injury or disease is compensable as a consequence of a compensable injury unless the compensable injury is the major contributing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Young v. Hermiston Good SamaritanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeBoard v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Arms v. SAIF Corp. (In re Arms)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. InteliStaf Healthcare v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API