Legal Opinion

Harper v. Pratt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1943No. 30984PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Maurine Hill Harper and Rosemary Hill Floyd, plaintiffs below, appeal from an order of the district court of Pontotoc county, Okla., sustaining motions for new trial filed by B. A. Pratt and Lee Bray, defendants below. Their primary contention is that the court committed reversible error in granting the defendants’ motions for new trial and vacating the judgment which had theretofore been rendered in the action in favor of plaintiffs.

The parties have outlined the pleadings and issues and have summarized the evidence introduced by each side and have argued at great length with respect to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. ThamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Avery v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Nale v. HersteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Propst v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Rein v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Ledbetter v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. West v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Dowell, Inc. v. LaytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API