Legal Opinion

Dowell, Inc. v. Layton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 16, 1953No. 35639PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NEAL, Justice.

Upon the return of the verdict for the defendant, plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial which was sustained by the trial court. Plaintiff’s petition is based upon the following allegations:

James R. Morris, an employee of Dowell, Inc., on February 26, 1951, at 8:00 a. m., was driving Dowell’s truck north on State Highway 76 at a point approximately ten miles north of Healdton, Oklahoma, at which point the driver of the truck turned left to enter an intersecting dirt road leading to an oil field; that plaintiff’s intestate, Johnie C. Mahan, was driving an automobile in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Browne v. BassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Folsom Morris Coal Mining Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Harper v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Smith v. MaherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Owens v. Turman Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Capshaw v. Gulf Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Houston v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Bishop's Restaurants, Inc. of Tulsa v. WhombleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Burnett v. TisdellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Ernest Wiemann Iron Works v. Hoerner Boxes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API