Ledbetter v. Howard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WATT, J.:
T1 We granted certiorari to address a single issue: whether the trial court erred in granting a motion for new trial on grounds of juror misconduct.1 Resolution of this issue requires us first to answer the question of whether the juror's affidavit was properly submitted as evidence in the hearing on the request for new trial.
1 2 We hold that the juror's affidavit demonstrating the injection into the deliberative process of extraneous prejudicial information was admissible under the "extraneous prejudicial information" exception to 12 0.8.2011 § 2606 (B)2 Furthermore, counsel were…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- ODOM v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- Thornton v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- BEYRER v. THE MULESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.