Legal Opinion
Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1929No. 18396PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, O.
The essential facts in this case are substantially as follows: Defendant in error is a railway company, having one of its railway shops in the city of Chickasha, in this state. Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the court below, was a common .laborer in the employment of the defendant in error, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. His labors were performed, in the shops of said company. One Robert Hall, who was codefendant in the action in the trial court, was also in the employment of the railway company, and held the title of apprentice boilermaker foreman. On the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Sovereign Camp v. ThiebaudSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Sanders v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Moline Plow Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Aldridge v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Shreve v. CornellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Consolidated Gas Utilities Co. v. BeatieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.