Legal Opinion

Shippan Point Ass'n v. McManus

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 1994No. 12338PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The plaintiffs1 appeal from the denial of their request for an injunction in their action to enforce a covenant prohibiting the construction of more than one dwelling on the defendants’ property.2 The defendants pleaded special defenses of changed circumstances, the statute of limitations, laches and comparative hardship. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the history of their property did not establish a basis for an injunction and (2) refused to enforce a restrictive covenant under the retained land theory. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Bernard v. GershmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Fortier v. Newington Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Grady v. SchmitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Wood v. AmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Cappo v. SudaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Bueno v. FirgeleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API