Legal Opinion
Contegni v. Payne
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 1989No. 6493PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants on the plaintiffs’ complaint seeking an injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant. The dispositive issues are whether the trial court erred (1) in concluding that the plaintiffs had failed to prove the existence of a uniform plan of development, and (2) in concluding that the covenant in the defendants’ deed did not limit the number of dwelling houses that could be built upon the defendants’ lot. We find error in part.
Certain facts are not in dispute. The plaintiffs and the defendants are residents of the Shippan…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Virgo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Carbone v. VigliottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Perkins v. FasigConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.