Legal Opinion

Wood v. Amer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 24, 1999No. AC 18410PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The plaintiff, Dorothy Wood, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her a temporary and permanent injunction prohibiting the named defendant, Laila Amer,1 from building a home on a lot located *603across the street from the plaintiffs property in Greenwich. The plaintiff sought the enforcement of certain restrictions contained in the defendant’s chain of title, which restrictions, the plaintiff claimed, were created for the benefit of her property. By way of special defense, the defendant argued that the action was barred by the three year statute of limitations set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Maganini v. HodgsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Shippan Point Ass'n v. McManusConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Quintard v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  5. Town of Watertown v. LamphierConnecticut Superior Court · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wood v. AmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Bird Peak Road Ass'n v. Bird Peak Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Demorais v. WisniowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Alligood v. LaSaracinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Bueno v. FirgeleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API