Grady v. Schmitz

The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendants2 on the plaintiffs’ complaint seeking an injunction to enforce a restrictive covenant. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in concluding that the covenant in question was not created to benefit the plaintiffs’ land, and that its original purpose could no longer be accomplished. We find error.

Certain facts are not in dispute. The plaintiffs own property known as 21 Grove Lane, in Greenwich. Their property is across from the defendants’ property, which is bordered by Grove Lane but is known as 111 Brook-*294side…