Legal Opinion
Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 28, 2006No. SC 17407PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether an automobile dealership that assigned automobile leases to a leasing company was that company’s agent for the purpose of entering into those leases. The plaintiffs, Steven Wesley (Steven) and Rachel Wesley (Rachel), brought this action against the defendants, Schaller Subaru, Inc. (Schaller), and Subaru Auto Leasing, Ltd. (Subaru Leasing), seeking, inter alia, reformation of an automobile leasing contract. Subaru Leasing appeals and Schaller cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court reforming the contract by including *529Ra…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Johnson v. Priceline.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.