Fortier v. Newington Group, Inc.

The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of the named defendant in this interpleader action.1 On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly found that no meeting of the minds existed between the plaintiff and the defendant and, therefore, the trial court failed to interpret and reconcile an option agreement in light *507of (1) the standard rules of contract interpretation, (2) the case law regarding the interpretation of option agreements, (3) the surrounding circumstances at the time the option was executed, (4) four utility easements needed to…