Sandblom v. Corbin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment granted in favor of the defendants in a zoning action.
The facts necessary for resolution of this controversy are as follows: Appellee, Camelback Shadows, Inc. (Camelback Shadows) is the owner of real property which is the subject of this appeal. On March 14, 1972, Camelback Shadows applied for a special use permit, pursuant to Article 24, Section 2401(l)(p), the 1969 Amended Zoning Ordinance for the Unincorporated Areas of Maricopa County (Ordinance), for the purpose of developing a new resort hotel. Accompanying this application were plans…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Durocher v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Campbell v. WestdahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Bird v. State Through CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Abbott v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.