Legal Opinion
Nesbit v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1977No. 11365, 11371PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
Appellants (hereinafter simply Nesbit) applied for a zoning change in 1966 from an R-2 status to an SU-1 designation which would have permitted a broader scope of uses. The initial development plan provided for 83 condominium units and was unopposed by the Intervenor-appellees (hereinafter Neighbors). In 1972 Nesbit requested approval of a new development plan for the SU property which changed the type and density of the use from 83 condominiums to 287 efficiencies and apartments. The City Planning Department denied the new plan, and its decision was approved by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holly Development, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Kubby v. HammondArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Cooper v. Albuquerque City CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Langston v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Story Bed & Breakfast, LLP v. Brown County Area Plan Commission and Patricia N. MarchIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Maso v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Aragon & McCoy v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Thomas W. Carter and Mary M. Carter v. City of Salina and the Salina City CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.