Legal Opinion

Durocher v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1972No. 41919PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

This is an appeal from a preliminary determination by the superior court that the King County Coun cil’s act of granting an “unclassified use permit” was an administrative act not subject to referendum but that such action was void because the county council is without power, under the home rule charter, to act in an administrative capacity.

In September 1969, respondents, Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc., for its lessee, Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (hereinafter referred to jointly as Weyerhaeuser), made application to Kong County for an “unclassified use permit”. They sought authority to excavate…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Ogden v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Floyd v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Fleming v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API