Legal Opinion

Bird v. State Through Corbin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 21, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 90-322PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Larry Bird and Suzanne Bird 1 (appellants) appeal from the trial court judgment dismissing their complaint against the State of Arizona (the State). The trial court granted the State’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the State is absolutely immune under A.R.S. § 12-820.01 from appellants’ claim because the claim relates to the licensing and regulation of structural pest control operators. We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing appellants’ complaint against the State.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE BELOW 2

When appellants filed their complaint on January 11, 1990, they…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API