Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Maricopa County Stadium District
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 5, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 94-0112PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
In this appeal we do not question the validity of the enactment of the sales tax by the Maricopa County Stadium District (“Stadium District”) or the use of the tax proceeds to construct the Bank One Ballpark; both may proceed unimpeded by this decision. 1 We do, however, examine the allegation that meetings by the Stadium District 2 were carried out in violation of the Arizona Public Open Meeting Law (“Open Meeting Law”). AR.S. §§ 38-431 to 431.09 (1985 & Supp. 1994).
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
When a group of private investors (“Owners Group”) inquired with Maricopa…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Town of Palm Beach v. GradisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Underwood v. City of Presque IsleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Arpaio v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Johnson v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 Governing BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Multimedia Publishing of North Carolina, Inc. v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. MoleraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.