Legal Opinion
Carlsen v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1952PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Whenever a new schedule is filed, the Interstate Commerce Commission, pending a hearing and decision by it as to the reasonableness of the new rates, may suspend the operation of the schedule for a period not exceeding seven months beyond the time the schedule otherwise would have become effective. 1
In the instant case, following the filing of new rate schedules by four interstate bus carriers, the plaintiff filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission a protest to the schedules and requested the Commission to suspend the proposed rates pending a determination of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935
- Merchant Truckmen's Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
- Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.