Legal Opinion
Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 6, 1935No. 337PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
This is a proceeding in equity under the authority of the Act of Congress of October 22, 1913, known as the Urgent Deficiencies Appropriation Act (U. S. C., title 28, § 41 (28), 43-48, 28 USCA §§ 41 (28), 43-48), to enjoin, suspend, set aside, and annul orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission made and entered on March 26, 1935, in a proceeding described as “Emergency Freight Charges, 1935, Ex parte No. 115” (208 I. C. C. 4). The plaintiffs are 179 corporations engaged in the business of mining coal in the states of Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency ProceduresSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moss v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.