Legal Opinion

Merchant Truckmen's Bureau v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an application for an interlocutory injunction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 47.

This matter having been argued Friday afternoon and decision being required before Monday, when the rate schedules will become effective unless stayed, this opinion must necessarily deal with the questions presented in rather summary fashion.

The court is of opinion that the petitioner’s right to a permanent injunction after final hearing is much too doubtful to justify the granting of an interlocutory injunction. It is doubtful whether the petitioner has any standing to maintain the suit,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Alexander Sprunt & Son, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
  2. Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1959
  3. Breswick & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Carlsen v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API