Legal Opinion

United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1973No. 72-535PublishedCited by 1,719 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

Under the Interstate Commerce Act, the initiative for rate increases remains with the railroads. But in the absence of special permission from the Interstate Commerce Commission, a railroad seeking an increase must provide at least 30 days’ notice to the Commission and the public before putting the new rate into effect. 49 U. S. C. § 6 (3).1 During that 30-day period, the Com*673mission may suspend the operation of the proposed rate for a maximum of seven months pending an investigation and decision on the lawfulness of the new rates. 49 XL S. C. § 15 (7).2 At the end of the seven-month *674period,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,719 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

1,714 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API