Legal Opinion

Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 14, 1971No. 24450PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a challenge to the preliminary treatment accorded by the Federal Power Commission to a rate increase filing by Boston Edison Company (“Edison”). The petition to review the Commission’s order has been filed by the Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield, Massachusetts (“Towns”), which own and operate municipal electrical distribution systems and purchase their total power supply from Edison, their wholesale supplier.

I. FACTS AND PRIOR HISTORY

On January 29, 1970, Boston Edison submitted for filing to the FPC a rate schedule, intended to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Wheelabrator Corp. v. ChafeeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API