Legal Opinion

Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 24, 1956No. Civ. A. 6289PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Circuit Judge.

This is another skirmish in the running battle over freight rates for transportation of carbon black from the Southwestern area to the industrial area in the East. The precise question presented is whether the Interstate Commerce Commission’s action in vacating a prior suspension of proposed rail rates was proper and, preliminary to that, whether such Commission act is reviewable at all. 1 We hold that it is, and that the action was improper.

Carbon black is an important product of natural gas. Consequently, the principal production is in that portion of United States…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Municipal Light Boards of Reading and Wakefield Massachusetts v. Federal Power Commission, Boston Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
  5. Florida Citrus Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1956

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API