Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
A schedule of reduced rates proposed by the respondent rail carriers was suspended by the Interstate Commerce Commission for the maximum statutory period of seven months pending a determination whether the reduction was lawful. The statute1 expressly provides that “the *660proposed change of rate . . . shall go into effect,” if the Commission’s proceeding has not been concluded and an order made within the period of suspension. The Commission did not reach a decision within seven months, or within the following five months during which the respondents voluntarily postponed the change, and the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.