Legal Opinion

Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1963No. 430PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

A schedule of reduced rates proposed by the respondent rail carriers was suspended by the Interstate Commerce Commission for the maximum statutory period of seven months pending a determination whether the reduction was lawful. The statute1 expressly provides that “the *660proposed change of rate . . . shall go into effect,” if the Commission’s proceeding has not been concluded and an order made within the period of suspension. The Commission did not reach a decision within seven months, or within the following five months during which the respondents voluntarily postponed the change, and the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API