Legal Opinion

Hopping v. Council of City of Richmond

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1915No. S.F. Nos. 7270, 7272, 7273PublishedCited by 107 opinions

APPLICATION originally made in the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District for a writ of mandate to compel the Council of the City of Richmond and the officers of said City to call an election for submitting to the voters of said City for approval or rejection of resolutions of the council, against which referendum petitions had been filed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. T. Kearney, Phil J. Strubel, and C. S. Hannum, for Petitioner.

Read the full summary

APPLICATION originally made in the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District for a writ of mandate to compel the Council of the City of Richmond and the officers of said City to call an election for submitting to the voters of said City for approval or rejection of resolutions of the council, against which referendum petitions had been filed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. T. Kearney, Phil J. Strubel, and C. S. Hannum, for Petitioner. Denson, Cooley & Denson, D„ J. Hall, Stanley Moore, and Marcel E. Cerf, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

These proceedings numbered 7270, 7272, and 7273, respectively, each entitled as above, are considered together for convenience. Each is an application to the district court of appeal for a writ of mandate to compel the' council of the city of Richmond and the officers of said city to call an election for the purpose of submitting to the voters of said city, for approval or rejection, resolutions of the council against which a referendum petition had been filed by the required number of electors of said city in the manner prescribed by law for such referendum proceedings. The members of the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wulzen v. Bd. of Supervisors of City & Cty of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. County of San Mateo v. CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API